“TWO ARE BETTER THAN ONE” MINISTRIES
Jim & Marie Watt - Web: www.2rbetter.org
Tel: 253-517-9195 - Email: email@example.com
March 1, 2010
APOSTLES & JUDGMENT
In a sense, the entire second letter of Paul to the Corinthians is a defense of his apostleship. This became necessary because of false-apostles who came to Corinth following the founding of this City Church by Paul. As one reads this letter of 13 chapters carefully, a full definition of “false-apostles” becomes most apparent. There is no doubt that some today who name themselves as apostles - fall into this same category. Ask yourself - “How many apostles do I know who walk in the spirit of Paul and Timothy and Titus?' This is the standard, the Plumbline of the true apostle. See especially 2 Corinthians 2:12-17; 3-5; 6-7; 10; 11-13. This is practically the whole letter; but it takes this to receive the true “standard” and “plumbline” for apostles of today. Only then can church leaders become like the church of Ephesus as commended by Jesus in Revelation 2:2.
Some are concerned about the correctness in speaking words of judgment on apostles today. Letters have come out doing this, and causing concern.
It ought to be understood that if judgment were necessary and not utilized, then confusion amongst the saints would reign. Yet if the judgment meted out is not according to scripture - that would be an imbalance bringing us into the opposite ditch. Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount does not forbid judgment! He merely states that he who judges must first judge himself, so that his life is pure in the areas in which he judges others. And I would add another principle at this point: that judgment on this high level would be better coming from a City Church leadership of Apostles and elders, as in Acts 15, not from an individual. In the multitude of counselors there is safety, not in the individual. The Holy Spirit through Solomon stresses this at least twice in the book of Proverbs. And Revelation 2:2 would seem to confirm this. It was the whole church of Ephesus Jesus was commending in this respect, not just an individual.
Paul was not at all hesitant in exposing the false apostles of his day, especially in the church of Corinth, and in the churches of Galatia. As an individual in this case, he had the advantage of being the apostolic founder of these churches. So as the mother or nurse of these churches as it were - he had a personal connection and right to defend what God had used him to found.
I do not sense the Lord leading me to speak specifically on the issues raised by many writing me; but I well realize that the majority of you will be aware of the issues being widely raised.
It is important to note that the OT prophets were led of God to confront kings, governors and leaders in their respective times and days. It seems that the majority were martyred for their faithfulness. So if in both OT and NT, God confirms that judgments are permissive - yet at the same time - they must come from lives that are consistent in these very areas; that they are in Spirit of God; and that they confirm to the contexts such as Paul walked in as the founder of 14 City Churches. And where people judged who were not founders, they did not do so unilaterally, but as a body such as the church of Ephesus in Revelation 2:2.
I trust that these somewhat general observations, may help those who under God like Paul and the leaders of Ephesus in Revelation, who are required to speak out - do so by a correct Plumbline for judgment in our day.
In 1971, 30 Apostolic teachers at large met with 8 local 5-fold ministry elders in Seattle for one week, and threshed some of the above issues out for a week of closed sessions morning and afternoon in June of that year. Derek Prince presented a one page guideline for handling interpersonal problems between such leaders, which was adopted completely and practiced for 2 years until the “Discipleship-Shepherding” controversy erupted in the early '70's. I am including it with my remarks as also being helpful for leaders today to thresh out these parallel issues. J.A.W.
COVENANT: SEATTLE PRESBYTERY – JUNE 1971
In 1971 a group of Seattle pastors under the leadership of Dennis Bennett of St. Luke’s – convened a conference composed of 30 North American traveling 5-fold ministries, with a core group of 8 local pastors.
Father Bennett had been ministering in Florida earlier in the year. As he and Bob Mumford had fellowship, Bob mentioned a serious problem. Many of these traveling ministries did not know each other, and found it easy to bad-mouth one another behind the back of the one referred to. This often took place both privately and publicly.
It was Bob’s belief, that if these men could meet for a week with one another in closed session – it would then be more difficult to speak disparagingly of one another in their absence.
Dennis told Bob of the Seattle pastors who were then meeting on a monthly basis – some 30 or so in number. He felt they would take this challenge, and play host for such a conference.
In January of 1971 the Seattle men unanimously accepted this challenge; and believed God to meet a normal weekly honorarium for each of the 30 traveling ministries, plus their full travel expenses, as well as their room and board while in Seattle.
Morning and afternoon for 10 sessions, Dennis chaired these closed meetings. Some dozen subjects came under scrutiny and discussion – but the most important subject centered on interpersonal relationships and problems – and how scripturally to address it.
Derek Prince presented a paper in 8 parts entitled “Covenant: Seattle Presbytery.” After serious discussion, it was accepted and signed by both the 30 delegates, and later by many other pastors in the SeaTac Metroplex.
In the 1700’s John Wesley prepared 52 sermons to train his Class Leaders of 8, who led some 70,000 at that time in weekly meetings in the British Isles. Later Lenin copied the Class Meeting concept and adapted it to Communist Cell Meetings. An English Sociologist of that day – not a Christian believer – stated emphatically, that apart from the Weekly Class Meetings inaugurated by the Wesleys – Great Britain would have experienced in a similar fashion what took place in the French Revolution of 1789.
John Wesley’s classic sermon on Matthew 18:15-17 was entitled, “The Cure of Evil Speaking.” Here is his definition – Any person who speaks of an absent brother in a derogatory manner, engages in “Evil Speaking.”
It is all too easy to use E-mails today in this manner, and thus violate the first commandment that Jesus gave the church, and the one we most often disobey and break
Following is the article Derek Prince prepared for Seattle in June of 1971. (I am reproducing this on “Word Processor” at the request of a present day local pastor.) -- Jim Watt
COVENANT: SEATTLE PRESBYTERY – JUNE 1971
1. We whose names are signed below believe that God has set us as leaders within the body of Christ in our area. We will respect the others whose names are signed below. (A: 1 Corinthians 12:12-28; Psalm 133.)
2. If at any time we have any criticism or complaint against any of the others, we will take the steps prescribed in Matthew 18:15-17 to retain the fellowship of our brothers: first, go to the person alone; second, if necessary, go to him with two or more witnesses; third, if necessary, bring the matter before the whole group. Thereafter, we will abide by any decision reached by the whole group. (B: Exodus 23:1; Leviticus 19:16; Psalm 15:3; Proverbs 6:16, 19; 20:19; 26:20; James 3:l-10).
3. If another person brings to us any criticism or complaint against any of those whose names are signed below, we will direct that person to take the steps prescribed in Matthew 18:15-17. If the situation requires, we will be willing to go with that person as a witness. We will not entertain any criticism or compliant against any of the others whose names are signed below, except in the presence of the one against whom the criticism or complaint is made. (B: above).
4. We will also respect all other leaders within the body of Christ in our area, upon two conditions: first, that we recognize their lives and ministries as being morally and ethically sound (C: 1 Timothy 1:3-4; 2 Timothy 2:19-22; Titus 2:7-8); secondthat they show due respect for the scriptures (D: John 14:23-24; 2 Timothy 3:16-4:2; 1 John 2:4-5) the Lord Jesus Christ (E: John 5:22-23; 10:7-9; 14:6; Acts 4:12; 1 Corinthians 3:11; 8:6; Ephesians 1:20-23; Colossians 1L18; 1 John 4:2-3); the Holy Spirit (F: John 14:16-17, 26; 16:13-14; 1 Corinthians 12:4-11); and the body of Christ (G: Matthew 18:17; 1 Timothy 3:14-15; 1 Corinthians 3:16-17; 5:12-6:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:12-13; Hebrews 13:7, 17, 24) in our area.
5. We will likewise respect any ministries whom God may from time to time direct to our area for the upbuilding of his body in our area, provided that they fulfil the two conditions stated in paragraph 4 above. (H: Matthew 10:40-41; Acts 11:22-24; 15:32-33; 18:27; 1 Corinthians 4:17; 16:10; Philippians 2:19-29; 3 John 5-8).
6. If at any time we have reason to believe that persons are seeking to minister or exercise influence within the body of Christ in our area, who do not fulfil the conditions stated in paragraph 4, we will not give our endorsement or support to their ministries or other activities, and we will notify accordingly the other leaders whose names are signed below, as well as any members of the body of Christ in our area who look to us for spiritual leadership. (I: Matthew 7:15-23; Galatians 1:8-9; 2 Timothy 3:6-9; Titus 1:9-11; 3:9-11; 2 Peter 2; 1 John 4:1-6; 2 John 7-11).
7. We agree that any one of us will no longer be recognized as a member of this group, if at any time:
(1) He voluntarily withdraws from this covenant;
(2) He moves to a place of residence outside our area;
(3) After fair and careful examination by the group it is decided that he no longer
fulfils the conditions stated in paragraph 4.
8. New leaders may at any time be added to this group, or former leaders reinstated, provided that they fulfil the conditions stated in paragraph 4, and that they voluntarily and sincerely accept the commitments contained in this covenant.
(NOTE: The above principles can easily be adapted for a local congregation, especially where they apply. It would be hoped that local pastors would recognize the discipline of their various local churches, and stand by a brother pastor or leader when discipline has been applied. Such a member should not be received by another local congregation until the problem has been made right.)