<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER">“<b>TWO
ARE BETTER THAN ONE” MINISTRIES</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>Jim
& Marie Watt</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>Tel:
253-517-9195 - Email: <a href="mailto:jmbetter@gmail.com">jmbetter@gmail.com</a></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>Web:
<a href="http://www.2rbetter.org/">www.2rbetter.org</a></b></p><p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER">February 23, 2012</p><p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><br></p>
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>2012-02-23
- THROUGH TRIBULATION - INTRODUCTION Part B - H. A. Baker</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><b>Darby's
Interpretations and “Inferences” - for our Translation prior to
anti-Christ</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><b>A.
The “Worthy-to-Escape” Passages</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><b>B.
The-One-Taken-and-the - Other - Left - Doctrine (A & B in
Introduction Part A)</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>C.
The Man-Child Theory</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
When Darby first accepted the Irvingite “spirit”-inspired woman's
any-moment, secret rapture teaching he at once grabbed symbolic
twelfth chapter of Revelation and pulled it in to help support his
new theory. “Here we have it,” Darby said, “the man-child is
the raptured church.” Bible students who ought to know say that so
far as students of church history seem to know, this idea of making
the man-child of Revelation refer to the rapture of the Church
started with John Darby. This new offspring born of Darby inference,
has surely been prolific - its generation is legion.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
This whole twelfth chapter of Revelation is figurative language, as
no one will deny. Its interpretation is not given in the Bible, as is
also undeniable. Any interpretation of this chapter must, therefore,
be by “inference.” Rampant throughout the church today are
innumerable false doctrines started by teachers who make the Bible
speak by “inference” where, in fact, it preferred silence.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
No man can prove anything by the twelfth chapter of Revelation, but
he can give his imagination full liberty here to warp it to fit
almost any theory. All we take time to say here is that this is not
proof text for Darby's theory, or any other theory, and to say
whatever the figurative language of this chapter may mean, it cannot
mean what Darby said, in view of the <b>facts</b> stated in the Word
of God as quoted in the following studies in this volume.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b>D.
Enoch, Elijah, Noah</b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
The Darby group brought in Enoch, Elijah and Noah to make them help.
Enoch and Elijah, they said, were types of the rapture of the Church
before the so-called great tribulation, while Noah and his family,
saved at the time of the flood, were types of the Jews being saved
<b>through</b> the great tribulation.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
Now what are the facts? The bible does not say that Enoch and Elijah
are types of anything. If their experiences are to prove anything or
to illustrate anything, they can be said to definitely prove that men
can be transformed and translated to heaven without having died. This
shows the possibility of the translation of living believers at the
time of the Lord's return; but, we may well ask, what is there about
the experiences of these two prophets to typify anything about the
<u>time</u><span style="text-decoration:none"> of the translation of
the Church, even if there be any typical connection? Elijah had
plenty of persecution while he was alive. No unusual great
tribulation or time of persecution followed soon after the
translation of Enoch or Elijah; what great tribulation were these men
caught away to “escape?”</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">What about the “inference”
that Noah typified the salvation of the Jews </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>through</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">
the great tribulation? The Bible definitely states that the salvation
of Noah and his family typifies </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>our</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">
salvation by baptism accompanied by right attitude of heart towards
God. 1 Peter 3:18-21. This typifies our being saved from destruction
in hell, does it not, according to the Bible? The day Noah entered
the ark all of the wicked in </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>all
of</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none"> the world were
</span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>destroyed</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">If we seek similarities, is it
not true that the Word of the Lord states that at the time the Lord
will return </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>after</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">
the great tribulation He will destroy the tares and gather the wheat
into His garner? However, there is no hint in the scripture that the
case of Noah was intended to teach anything about the rapture of the
Church. This interpretation by “inference” was new interpretation
never taught before Darby's day, but introduced by him to help his
new doctrine.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b><span style="text-decoration:none">The
Church and the Book of Revelation</span></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">By the “inference”-plan
started by Darby and his Plymouth Brethren, the book of Revelation
was given new interpretations. In this way the messages to the seven
churches were supposed to be types of seven church - “dispensations,”
although there is nothing in the messages themselves, or other
statements of scripture, that indicate such meaning.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">From the end of the third chapter
to the end of the book nothing applies to the Church, the Darbyites
said, for the Church is not specifically mentioned after the third
chapter. The fact that the Church is not mentioned by name after the
third chapter of Revelation is no more proof that it had been taken
from the earth than that it was not on earth when some of the
epistles were written, for in some of them the Church is not
mentioned.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b><span style="text-decoration:none">Darby's
New Dispensation</span></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">However, Darby nor anyone else
denies that saints and believers appear all through the book of
Revelation. If the Church would not then be on earth, who must these
saints in Revelation be? Very evidently there must be a new
“inference” to fit the new problem. Here is the new make-up which
authorities say never before appeared. The Darby-school decided there
must be a new and special and unique “dispensation” intervene
between between the time the Lord comes to take His Church by rapture
to heaven and the time of the end of the age after the reign of the
anti-Christ. This so-called dispensation they called “The Great
Tribulation.”</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Although this period will be the
greatest time of tribulation the world has ever seen, there appears
to be no proof from church history that the term, “the great
tribulation,” was ever applied to these concluding years alone.
Anyway, the important point is that Darby claimed that during these
years in question the Lord would again deal with Israel in a new way
and that a different gospel - called “the gospel of the kingdom”
- would be preached during these years and that the result of this
would be a different class of believers whom Darby called “the
tribulation saints.”</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Here it would be easy to write a
few whole chapters showing the error of these “inferences.” But
why the need? Do we not all know there can be no other gospel?? Did
not Paul say that if any one preached another gospel, let him be
accursed? Surely we all know that in Christ there is neither Jew nor
Greek. Col. 3:28. We know well enough that Christ broke down the wall
of partition between Jew and Gentile, making them one body. Eph.
2:14. We also know that all true believers become members of the
Church, the body of Christ, do we not?</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><span style="text-decoration:none">Now,
if Darby was right in calling the time of the anti-Christ “The
Great Tribulation” exclusively, then this period must be the time
of the greatest revival the world has ever known. The Word says: “I
beheld, and lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all
nations and kindreds and people, and tongue stood before the throne,
and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes ... these are they
which came out of [the] great tribulation, and have washed their
robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Rev. 9:14. (This
is the only place the article “the” occurs in the Greek in this
connection).* Note* We believe that “the great tribulation” out
of which comes the great multitude which no man can number out of
every nation, tribe and tongue, began when Adam sold out to the
devil. The entrance of sin into God's world brought great tribulation
to all mankind and especially to the saints of God who have always
been compelled to live in the midst of the enemies of God. While the
earth has always been in great tribulation, the end time, under the
reign of Satan and the anti-Christ, will be a time of such
concentration of the powers of evil that it will be worse than has
ever been before, or shall be, the scripture states. “Now we
beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by
our gathering together unto him, that you be not soon shaken in mind,
or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from
us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by
any means; for that day shall not come, except there come a falling
away first, and that man of sin be revealed above all that is called
God, or that is worshiped.” 2 Thess. 2:1-4.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><span style="text-decoration:none">To
the casual reader this passage definitely states that the coming of
Christ and the translation of living believers would not be till
after the reign of the man of sin. As already stated, the early
church fathers and other church writers and the church creeds up till
the time of Darby accepted this passage of scripture just as it
reads.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><span style="text-decoration:none">Darby
attempted to remove this barrier that blocked his new doctrine by
saying that the “coming of our Lord Jesus Christ” was not the
same as “the day of Christ.” The Darby-school went still farther
and stated that the “day of Christ” is not the same as “the day
of the Lord.” These men “infer” that and dogmatically state it
as a a fact; but by what scripture do they prove it? A statement
without proof is not proof. Let any reader take a concordance and
search out all the references to the “day of the Lord,” the “day
of Almighty,” the “Day of Christ,” the “Day of Jesus Christ,”
etc. and compare what the Darby-school “infer” and state with
what the Bible says.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><span style="text-decoration:none">Just
look at the above passage. Is Paul not going to special pains in
writing to these Christians to tell them not to be deceived by a
“spirit,” or by a letter, or by any claiming Paul's authority, or
by any other means? Did he not try to make them know without any
doubt whatever that the coming of the Lord would not be till after
the reign of the man of sin? That's the way I read it.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><span style="text-decoration:none">If
the Lord was to come “any moment” to catch these saints up to
heaven and they were to have nothing to do with the man of sin, why
bother them about it and get them confused by using confusing
language and terms that did not mean what was apparent? Was Paul not
very evidently trying to make things very clear to these Christians?
If Darby is right, Paul failed, did he not? If this passage cannot
be understood as it reads, then Paul failed to write clearly. If
Darby is right, then who would naturally read this scripture and even
“guess” what Darby saw unless told about it by someone
indoctrinated in the Darby-school? Let me here ask the reader, in all
sincerity, whether he ever thought of such an interpretation of this
passage as Darby gave until he heard it given by others or read it
somewhere.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b><span style="text-decoration:none">What
About Giving It to The Jews?</span></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Here is another passage of
scripture that, taken as it reads, stood squarely against the
so-called pre-tribulation theory of the Darby group. It reads:
“Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be
darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall
fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. And
then shall appear the sign of the Son of man: and then shall all the
tribes of he earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in
the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.” Matt. 24:29, 30.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">What did Darby do with this
passage that stood directly in his way? Why, he gave it to the Jews!
Since his theory claimed that was to be the rapture of the Church
</span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>before</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">
the reign of the man of sin and since there would be saints when the
Lord came “immediately </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>after</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">”
that reign, here was something to be “explained.” Here is the way
Darby “explained” it: He said that during the period of the reign
of the man of sin, the lawless one, the anti-Christ, the Lord would
deal with the Jews in a special way and that during this period the
Jews would lead in the proclamation of the “gospel of the kingdom.”
Later modifications of this theory also brought in a mysterious,
unique group of Gentiles to witness at this time. The result, it was
claimed, would be what they called “the tribulation saints.” This
Jewish remnant and their converts were the ones to whom the Lord
referred in speaking of His coming “immediately after the
tribulation of those days,” and all this in no way concerned the
Church, the Darbyites asserted.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Having started with Darby, this
new scheme of giving-it-to-the-Jews, called by critics “the
Jewish-waste-basket,” has opened the door for “inferences” and
“interpretations” and “theories” galore. The Darby-Scofield
teachers by this giveaway plan, made all of the after-tribulation
signs concerning the Lord's return apply to the Jews. Some of the
Darby line, by this Jewish waste-basket-plan, have given all of the
sermon on the mount to the Jews alone. Others have given the whole
gospel of Matthew to the Jews, while still others have sliced out
diverse sections of other parts of the New Testament and handed these
all over to the Jews exclusively.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Since all this is about the Jews
by “inference” and every man is free to “infer” as he likes,
so long as real proof is not essential in this system, why not just
as well make one clean sweep by one big all-inclusive “inference”
and “infer” that we are out of it all, for the whole New
Testament, except a small portion, was written by Jews and the New
Testament, or New Covenant, according to the Bible, was a covenant to
be made with the Jews. To who was the Holy Spirit directly promised?
The Jews. To whom was directly given the command to preach the gospel
to the whole world? The Jews. Salvation is from the Jews, Jesus said
so. To the Jews were given the covenants and the promises. Paul said
so.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">This Darby-Scofield “inference”
of give-it-to-the Jews comes to another self-contradiction in the
Scofield Bible in which it is claimed that Jesus came to the Jews as
the Messiah and that had they accepted Him, He would then and there
have set up His kingdom on earth and there would have been no death
on the cross; but, since the Jews rejected Jesus, He died on the
cross and as a result the Church age came in as a parenthesis in the
Lord's dealing with the Jews.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Thus the Lord's plan about His
kingdom to give-it-to-the Jews, according to Scofield, having failed,
we got in on the present plan of salvation through the cross and have
the hope of resurrection from the dead. There would be no “second
coming” of Christ at all, had the Jews acted as the Lord expected,
according to Scofield.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Does not all this show that we
can follow the Jewish waste-basket false “theory” and give the
whole Bible to the Jews, or we can reject the </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>whole
theory</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none"> and appropriate
all the of the New Testament promises for Jewish and Gentile
believers alike?</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Thus can we not, with assurance,
say that when Jesus was talking to His disciples about the signs they
would see and about His coming “immediately </span><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>after</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none">
the tribulation of those days”, He was talking about what Jew and
Gentile believers alike would see? If not, why not? If He meant
otherwise, would He not have clearly said so?</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><b><span style="text-decoration:none">Summary</span></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">The foregoing discussion should
show that the pre-tribulation-rapture theory started in the days of
Darby is founded on “inference” only and that the inferences
drawn are unsupported by definite scripture and in many cases are
contradictory to clear teaching of the Word of God. We have
considered this under the topics:</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> The-worthy-to escape-doctrine.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> One-taken-and-one-left.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> The man-child theory.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> Enoch, Elijah and Noah.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> The Church and the book of
Revelation.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> A new dispensation theory.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> Darby and the Thessalonian
letters.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none"> About giving it to the Jews.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">We have now considered the main
inference-supported foundation of the imminent rapture theory, while
other still more doubtful “inferences,” too numerous to mention,
are also brought forth to give support to this new doctrine which
lacks even </span><u>one</u><span style="text-decoration:none">
direct statement of the scripture.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">I was reluctant to write this
chapter that will be so contrary to former beliefs of so many of my
friends; but I became convinced that it was necessary to clear up
much misunderstanding and to set forth in this way some things the
Bible does </span><u>not teach</u><span style="text-decoration:none">
concerning the theme under consideration.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT">
<span style="text-decoration:none">Will the reader now, with as
little prejudice as possible, turn to the positive study of the Word
of God as set forth in the following chapters and stick at it to the
end in order to give the subject a fair and complete consideration.
Amen! Then let us proceed.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><u><b>NOTE</b></u><span style="text-decoration:none"><b>:
</b></span><span style="text-decoration:none"><span style>Dr.
James R. Graham came to the Kostner Avenue Baptist Church of Chicago,
possible in 1957-58. He as a Presbyterian scholar, had gone to China
as a missionary, and became very proficient in the Chinese language,
probably Mandarin. His superiors commissioned him to translate the
Notes of “The Scofield Bible” into Chinese. Half-way through this
assignment, he discovered that these Notes were not based on
Scripture - but on “inferences.” As a man of integrity he
approached his superiors and resigned his commission in the light of
his new-found convictions.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration:none">“<span style>Through
Tribulation”: by H.A. Baker was probably written in the early
1930's. One of the best books ever written on “The Rapture.” This
book is very rare. On a “Google-Search” under H.A. Baker, and on
page 2, see [PDF] “Under His Wings”, the autobiography of our
author, made available to us by his great grandson, Elisha James
Baker, August 2008. During his College days in the Midwest, H.A.
Baker excelled as the lead on his debating team, and won many debates
with other colleges. As you read “Through Tribulation”, you will
see debating skills come forth as he exposes the grave fallacy of the
“Secret Rapture” teaching. I came across his writings as a new
convert in 1944, and possess most of his writings. JAW.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="CENTER"></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><font size="3"><b>TO
SUBSCRIBE - Please Email: <a href="mailto:mailing-subscribe@2rbetter.org">mailing-subscribe@2rbetter.org</a></b></font></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><font size="3"><b>TO
UNSUBSCRIBE - Please Email: <a href="mailto:mailing-unsubscribe@2rbetter.org">mailing-unsubscribe@2rbetter.org</a></b></font></p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0.01in;margin-bottom:0in" align="LEFT"><font size="3"><b>FOR
ARCHIVE ARTICLES - Web:<a href="http://2rbetter.org/pipermail/mailing/">http://2rbetter.org/pipermail/mailing/</a></b></font></p>